More Reflections on Freedom and “The Pit”

modern-timesI often return to the recurring theme in my life, and I still work at it and do all I can to “reality-check” it. This theme is one of the relationship between the human person (me or anyone else) with the world we live in. It is no new issue, and the drama has played out throughout history. There has always been the status quo of the majority in society and the minority, the person who is variously a freedom fighter, a terrorist, a criminal or who simply opts out. We all live this tension in different ways and surround our quandary with various philosophical theories or ideologies.

I have written before on the subject of Christian anarchism in Another Nibble at Christian Anarchism and the earlier article Christian Anarchism. Much of the Gospel concerns this tension of the child of freedom under the New Testament against the slave of the Old Law. Christ’s message has often been compared with ancient Greek cynicism.

For the Cynics, the purpose of life was to live in virtue, in agreement with nature. As reasoning creatures, people could gain happiness by rigorous training and by living in a way which was natural for humans, rejecting all conventional desires for wealth, power, sex, and fame. Instead, they were to lead a simple life free from all possessions.

I think this is the essential of Christianity, at least at a moral level, as emulated by the medieval Franciscan movement. Of course, there is also the sacrificial and sacramental aspect of the Christ-Mystery which is perpetuated by the apostolic Church, more or less faithful to what seems to be an originally Cynical ideal. This ideal, present wherever individual persons are confronted with any anonymous and inhuman system, pervades our society as at other times when humanity was threatened by totalitarianism of any kind from British Imperialism, French Imperialism, anyone else’s Imperialism, Fascism, Communism, Capitalism or Socialism. The present totalitarianism, capitalism, seems about to go the way of Caesar’s Empire or Herman Goering – but a lot of people will suffer until they can learn to adapt to a new paradigm.

I was reading a sailing blog this morning, one in French (here if you’re interested) and it hit home for me in many ways. Sailing for reasons other than transport, warfare and fishing, was once called the sport of kings. A boat or a ship (a vessel capable of carrying a tender or other landing craft) is a large and expensive piece of equipment, and the violent action of the weather and the sea often cause the owner to carry out expensive repairs. That is an inescapable reality, no different from houses, cars, computers or washing machines. Some things in our lives are purely useful and utilitarian, and others make our life more pleasant.

The writer of this French blog seems to have a chip on his shoulder about the boat being a status symbol of its owner, with a whole issue of urban snobbery. The same goes for expensive cars and sports utility vehicles, especially when much less would do to transport people and goods by road. Ultimately, we are all free to spend our money as we want and assume our commitments in terms of paying back the debt of however much the thing cost and what’s needed to maintain it in optimum working order. I often see these big expensive cars in towns and big expensive boats in ports – and don’t envy those who have to pay for them. In the world of yachts, as in any single-interest group, you have people like in the gentlemen’s clubs in London who want the privilege and not have to share it. On the other hand, you have others who do want to share an inestimable gift with others and create a kind of parallel society. This you will find in all walks of life, from the yacht club to the Church, from the local pub to anything else.

Our friend of the French blog describes the life of the sea as perfectly suited to the spirit of the anarchist. Yes, the sea is a space of freedom by its covering more surface area of this planet than land and its hostility to human life. Thus, the sea can only be inhabited by humans by means of seagoing vessels, and only for short periods of time – from a few hours in an open boat to a few months in an ocean-going ship. During the time we are at sea, we leave everything behind – political power, markets, money, authority, the so-called “Pit” of modern life. This is the thing that enamoured me to the enigmatic figure of Captain Nemo in the world of Jules Verne – Jules Verne and the Sea. The problem with Captain Nemo is when his idealism became violence and destruction when it came to sinking the ships of the authorities he hated. We don’t get anywhere by hatred and revenge, and the Christian Gospel gives us the way. But, this embittered man also represented an ideal that captured my boy’s mind at the age of about 12. I have only changed in the details, not the foundation.

The chance to put to sea on my own terms is a little taste of that aspiration of the soul. I am limited only by the fact that my boat is only a ten-footer and can be safe in a force 4 wind and not to much in the way of waves. There is the limit – I am a coast-hugger and limited to staying very close to land. On the other hand, there is even more “freedom” of “being near the shore but not of it” to misquote the Christian’s usual attitude about the “world” in the Joannine meaning of the word.

The personality of Captain Nemo, apart from the ship-sinking hatred that drives him, is in a way prophetic. There is a strong protest against the use of technology for warfare and killing or enslaving. He is almost a kind of Robin Hood figure robbing the rich to feed the poor, voicing the protest of the outlaw against the forces of money and corrupting power. It is almost a Jungian archetype, technology used to combat the abuse of technology by the powerful majority. But in the end, there is the aspect that mars – Nemo is little more than a pirate. Piracy nowadays is a very sordid business of horrible men in powerful motorboats attacking cargo ships off the east coast of Africa and making those waters inaccessible to the circumnavigating yachtsman. Piracy was probably just the same in the past, except that it has been romanticised by films and books from about the nineteenth century. The real issue here is the our freedom is limited by that of other people. Otherwise we would become anti-socials and criminals. That is always where anarchism has become unstuck, as soon as someone commits a terrorist act like planting a bomb and killing innocent people.

There is another category of marine anarchists – tramps, like the ill-clad man in the street of a city asking you for the money you earned through your honest work. Already, it is an improvement when this man asks for money instead of attacking you to steal it. It is even more of an improvement when the tramp (who is no longer a beggar) finds a way to earn what he needs, bartering for necessities through offering services. I met a man in my chandler’s shop who was preparing a circumnavigation in a large Westerly yacht. I asked him how one finances such an adventure. You save up what you need as a reserve and you do “little jobs” wherever you go: language teaching, repair work to cars and machines, whatever you can do. You don’t expect much in return, just food and a little “top-up” money. It takes about three years to sail around the world, so this is something you need to think about. You don’t need money at sea, but you do need food and warmth.

One of my favourite historical characters, since Nemo had to be discredited in my mind for his violence and bitterness, is Joshua Slocum. He suffered bankruptcy and being widowed. His life meant nothing other than the call of the sea. His book is wonderful and refreshing in its down-to-earth way, and the absence of bitterness or hatred against what he had left behind. Life becomes motivated by a whole different set of priorities and values, until one is lost at sea or returns to land as an enlightened prophet or wise man. Such was also the way of the contemplatives in the desert!

The rest of this blog’s thought is more specially of interest to sailors, where we learned to sail, whether it is a status symbol of a way of finding ourselves before God, whether the only thing that matters is competition and evermore expensive racing vessels or the joy of being afloat and discovering something. In all walks of life, we shy away from the values of power, competition and money to restore the human person and the spirit. Ideology can enter any walk of life, from the traditional Latin liturgy to having the best nec plus ultra boat that money can buy.

The present financial and political crisis in the USA brings me to consider the various answers people have attempted in order to define the person’s relationship with “The Pit“, this term being defined as the world outside someone’s (cf. The Invisible Empire of Romantia) particular way of escaping into an ideal world. Christianity also proposes the opposite of the “world” – the Kingdom of God, parables being used by Christ to convey the inner meaning. There is the myth of the survivalist who dreads the total breakdown of society, and believes he can retreat to the forest with a gun, a bar of gold and three months’ supply of corned beef and butter beans! We might be tempted to think we could do it in a boat! At least the boat can move around, however slowly it does so…

Perhaps freedom is an illusion, but yet so is the world we live in, based on a notion of money that corresponds with neither property nor human work. As we advance in years, we ask whether anything has been worth it, whether life ever had any meaning. We fall victim to the noonday devil of acedia. I have seen this over the years with priests in parish ministries, bloggers and contemplatives. We have to fight to be free from prisons of our own making, and often that is only possible by asceticism and symbolism that means something for us.

Perhaps something will make us a little more hardy in the face of adversity, whatever form that might take, is the possibility of managing on our own, doing things ourselves what others did for us in exchange for money, being satisfied with less and more simple things. One essential point I am making is the need to remain a sign of contradiction, keeping up the tension between us and the “system”, “pit” or whatever you want to call it. In the time to come, we will do this in different ways. Going through the various ideas on the internet, there is the temptation of the bandwagon, the signgle-idea hobby horse, the “orthodoxies” of those who themselves seek advantage and gain. It is only human.

As in Catholic Christianity (as opposed to the institutional notion of “the” Church), we have to learn to be individuals and persons, always open to the “other”, be it God or those we love or with whom we keep polite relations. We have to manage on our own or in little like-minded communities. Small is beautiful. Will a general collapse of debt-based illusory economies enable us to build new and small societies and make do with what we’ll have, however difficult that would be?

Many are alarmists and make mountains of conspiracy theories. We need to be informed and learn about things, react rationally and moderately. This is something I learned whilst speculating on the current situation in the USA. It will probably be business as usual as their national debt goes up and up and up and they continue to rape the world’s resources. The zero point is either now or in a couple of years’ time. What happens over there will come over here to Europe, and some of us might be able to make a new start somehow. It will help to have been something of a rebel and a cynic in the ancient Greek meaning of that word.

Like many, I am afraid and feel highly vulnerable, and don’t know where the blows will come from. Life is so precarious. I look out of the window and see the trees swaying in the wind and the rain spattering against the panes. Yesterday, I found a brief respite in the weather to sail along the Alabaster Coast from Saint Valéry en Caux to the north cardinal buoy of Paluel, enjoying a hearty east wind and swell for surfing – and today it was a slog just to cross over the yard to the chapel to say Mass. Wise people of the east – and Christ – would tell us to count our blessings and treasure what we have without looking to have yet more. Many of us come to that point, and we will be the happier for it.

Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness! No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? Behold the fowls of the air: for they sow not, neither do they reap, nor gather into barns; yet your heavenly Father feedeth them. Are ye not much better than they? Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit unto his stature? And why take ye thought for raiment? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow; they toil not, neither do they spin: And yet I say unto you, That even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. Wherefore, if God so clothe the grass of the field, which to day is, and to morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith? Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? (For after all these things do the Gentiles seek:) for your heavenly Father knoweth that ye have need of all these things. But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Mysticism and Asceticism

There is an extremely interesting article from the Latin Mass Society Chairman Joseph Shaw in his blog – Mystical not ascetic: a response to Pope Francis, Part 5. This is the last part of a series of articles on Pope Francis. As I have mentioned elsewhere, I am of the conviction that we don’t need the Pope to be Catholics, and that we are Catholics in various Churches that are not in communion with Rome. Of course that subject is open to debate, but I do not flinch from such a position.

What is of interest to me is that what seems to be entering the picture is a third way, one that is neither liberal nor conservative. He begins with the distinction in Pope Francis’ mind between mysticism and asceticism – “Ignatius is a mystic, not an ascetic”. Mysticism is openness to the influence of the supernatural, of the Holy Spirit, and asceticism in his mind is close to legalism and being closed in on oneself. He is very insistent on criticising the kind of Christian who wants to turn back the clock, go by rigid rules and want everything clear and safe. Being attached to Tradition transcends looking to authority and discipline for doctrinal security. Tradition is the wholeness of the Church and the Christian experience in the whole of history, and not merely the period when the Church seemed to offer the most security and certitude.

This distinction may seem to be a little tortured, but it reflects some of my own thought over the years, and also that of some so-called “modernists” from the beginning of the twentieth century, Tyrrell in particular. That is a notion of being attached to traditional forms of liturgy and spirituality without being of a legalist or authoritarian attitude. We come to the idea that such “traditionalism” is not a part of the “liberal” and “conservative” dialectic. Many traditionalists are not “extreme conservatives” but rather of another category altogether. The points on which “traditionalists” differ from the “conservatives” are exactly legal positivism and Ultramontanism. Incredible! That this should come from a Roman Catholic’s pen!

Being a traditionalist in this perspective is being critical of these conservative tenets. We find Pope Francis showing opposition to canonical positivism and the centralisation of the Church with its logical consequence in Ultramontanism. One capital principle of canon law is salus animarum seprema lex – laws are overridden by the spiritual principles of Christianity. The moral obligation to obey laws is overturned when their literal observance would go against the whole purpose of ecclesiastical law. Laws have to promote the common good, and it is not legitimate to use law as a tool for gaining personal power – for example. Looking through the layers, I see Pope Francis calling upon the principle of subsidiarity – decisions being made at the lowest levels possible: leaving to diocesan bishops what diocesan bishops find within their competence, and the same with parish vicars and vestry councils. In that way, we don’t need to hear doctrines and moral teachings repeated ad nauseum by the Pope so that they may be that much “more true” for us. Still, many things said by Pope Francis seem to be incoherent, far from “infallible” and often confusing. It is not my duty to defend him at all costs – though there is a very appealing “core”.

Traditionalists like Dr Geoffrey Hull have influenced my own thinking in that they are critical of centralism and absolute Papal authority. In this, they differ from conservatives. A highly apposite point is that traditionalists appeal to the principle of preserving and fostering local liturgical rites and uses. Conservatives see liturgical pluralism as a source of problems and a lack of unity in the Church, above all a lack of lock-step discipline. Traditionalists are more likely to disobey through the use of their conscience. Do not we Anglicans see our own faces in this particular mirror?

One thing I do notice about this Pope is that his positions are not typical of the old liberalism of the 1970’s or the Anglican Establishment. I try to see through the tacky vestments and externals that seem to have taken the post-Benedict XVI Church back to the 1970’s. His doctrine of the priesthood is completely traditional. The liberal sees secularism as the yardstick to which religious practice should be conformed for the purpose of fostering political issues or “going beyond” Christ. We should be open to the world – but not of the world. Liberals love bureaucracy, committees and meetings. The Jesuit Pope sees the priest called to the front lines of his ministry and the sacrificial dimension. One thing by which we will be able to judge the Pope in the coming years will be how he deals with bureaucracies and all the stuff that makes the Church inaccessible to ordinary folk.

These considerations will not classify the Pope as a “traditionalist” and certainly not a “traditionalist” who is really a “super conservative”. Anyone’s words can be twisted around to mean anything. This is why I am not interested in “Pope-sifting”. We have to try to understand the underlying philosophy and get beyond the “buzz” phrases and the trappings.

We need to explain that Traditional Catholics are not hyper-conservatives with all the baggage of Ultramontanism and legalism…

It’s an interesting thought, but many of the RC traditionalists I came across were “super conservatives” and “true church” fanatics. But not all by a long chalk. All we can really understand from Pope Francis is his criticism of both conservatives and liberals. Does he recognise a “third way” transcending Tweedledum and Tweedledee? Only time will tell.

In regard to the use of the old Latin liturgy, the Pope seems concerned that it should become a kind of “ideological banner”. On the other hand, he has wonderful things to say about the Orthodox Liturgy and everything we attribute to our own traditional rites and uses. As mentioned in an earlier article, much will be discovered by the Pope’s choice of someone to head the liturgical department of the Vatican.

The traditionalist world is extremely diverse, with Jansenistic (“Augustinian” puritanism) undercurrents together with other theories more or less detached from reality or common sense. We continuing Anglicans, especially Anglo-Catholics, have much in common with the eminently liturgical motivation of our dissidence from the “mainstream”. Problems arrive when there are obsessions, single-issues and hobby horses, rather than an honest attempt to see the big picture. We have analogical problems in our circles.

I suppose, as this series of articles was written by a Roman Catholic, it is an appeal for “traddies” to get their act together and get rid of the cranky “stuff”. It would be a start. One lesson can be learned from the American experience of Prohibition in the 1930’s. Ban alcohol, and human nature will bring people to want to drink it increasingly. Ban the old Mass – and it is a most unpastoral thing to do. Prohibiting the old liturgy brings people to revolt and come up with self-justifying theories. If people could just get on with life, there would be no controversy, and the Church would be one in peace. We still have alcoholism and drunkenness in countries where people can drink freely, but perhaps less so than under Prohibition. I think the comparison is valid.

Wherever we are, in the RC Church, some dissident traditionalist community, or among us continuing Anglicans on the “other side of the fence”, the priority is not our self-justification but our Christian commitment and to the living and incarnate Christ through the Sacrament, the liturgy and beauty. Once we just get on with life, the world might become that little bit more peaceful – and nearer to God.

* * *

Update: see Alms and Liturgy. How Francis Wants Them by Sandro Magister. For all the good words we read, we cannot count on this Pope for the liturgy. Thank goodness we Anglicans don’t have to!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments

Bogus Technical Support Scam

Indian_Phone_Scammers_Claiming_to_be_MicrosoftI have just had a “cold call” from a man with a heavy Indian accent telling me that my computer was full of “errors” and that I had to follow a particular procedure. I smelled a rat immediately and told him that I was asking the questions. When I asked him whether he was living in India or England, he put the phone down.

I looked up in Google using the opening line of this person “I’m calling you about your computer errors” and came up with Phone scammers call the wrong guy, get mad and trash PC. Exactly!

When he asked me to start pressing keys on my computer, I did not do so, but asked him what happens when I do so. They are not prepared for questions. I was suspicious immediately, because I have been using computers and internet for a long time – and have learned about trolls, scammers and other undesirables. Apparently, if you complete the process and allow them direct access to your computer, they have you hand over a load of money via Paypal and then they trash your computer with real viruses or by deleting your data.

The best thing is to terminate the conversation immediately, but if you know about them you can play them like a hooked fish – if it makes you feel better. Just disconnect your computer from the internet during the call as a precaution – but they need you to set up the internet communication line. They can’t do it.

We have had the Nigerian 419 scam, phishing and now this. A healthily cynical attitude on our part should indicate that they are suspect by the fact they are phoning us and they “need” something. It is the same thing with all phone marketing – just tell them to find a job! If we call for technical support, we normally get the number we dialled and the genuine agency (Microsoft, etc.).

Remember real support phone lines don’t call us. We call them.

Watch the video and be wise. Another link on this subject: Virus phone scam being run from call centres in India.

Here’s someone who had fun with the Indians:

Don’t try this unless you know what you’re doing.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 5 Comments

The Passing of an Era

hyperinflation-banknoteIt has happened before: the fall of the Roman Empire, the transition of the Middle-Ages into the Renaissance, the French Revolution, Marxist Communism the Great Depression and the Nazi hell. Now we seem to be looking at the end of capitalism and the present debt-based economy.

I am not an economist and understand little about what is going on in America except in the simple terms of most of us – we get into debt and our creditors can help themselves to our property if we don’t pay what we owe. I have read many articles about the possible collapse of the US Dollar if they refuse to raise the debt ceiling and default. The scenarios are indeed frightening because of the human cost to us all throughout the world.

In bygone ages money represented its value in gold, and more particularly the human work and produce that made of money a medium of fair exchange. I was always taught as a child that the world owed no one a living and that we had to go out and earn it. We could buy things we saved up for, and if it was really necessary to borrow and contract a debt, we would go ahead only if we knew how much we could take off our weekly wages for the repayments. People older than I remember such simple rules in life, though it must be said that the generation before me lived through the Great Depression as children. In a small economy, money is simply a medium of exchange with an agreed and objective value. You got paid for working or having something to sell, and you would buy what you needed with your own money. Money has been around for a very long time. Jesus speaks of the Roman denarius, saying that what was due to be paid in taxes to the Empire was to be paid, and man’s debt to God was in another order altogether.

At some point came another notion of economics which escapes the common sense of most of us ordinary folk. It is a notion of money that is unrelated to the value of property, precious metals and human work. It became abstract and an object of speculation. The modern economy is based on debt. Banks and business buy debts, whilst most of us struggle to pay them and be owners rather than debtors! I have a brother-in-law who is a banker. He once tried to explain to me the advantage of buying debt. It seemed like buying the right to get the interest from the debtor, so that’s where the profit is. I assume the usury interest is higher than the price of the debt! Cross that with all the “Chinese” we read and hear from stock exchanges and those charged with the finances of states and governments – and we get really confused.

The relationship between money and what it is supposed to represent (for convenience the gold bullion standard) is what separates different political tendencies between conservatives and socialists. Another huge problem is the staggering amounts represented by petroleum products and energy in general. We arrive at the end of the industrial age, which began by farming people being dispossessed and forced into the dark satanic mills of William Blake’s Jerusalem. That economy is an illusion, a bubble, the world of financial speculation. We have a whole illusory world of credit and debt, markets, hedge funds, offer and demand and many more terms understood only by economists. Above all we have obscenely big businesses and ordinary people being deprived of an honest livelihood.

Financial speculation causes untold human sufferings. If the price of an ordinary house in southern England in the 1930’s was some £30,000 in today’s value (£300-400 in those days), the present market price would be ten times that – £300,000 – ten times more than can be reasonably afforded by an ordinary working family. Energy is another victim of speculation, and we now learn that prices of necessities like water and food are being jacked up by speculation. Millions are plunged into poverty and starvation whilst those who can afford food are wasting it. Third World countries become so helplessly poor that a whole traffic of human persons wishing to immigrate into the western world becomes another subject of speculation and organised crime. Very few own the greatest part of wealth in this world. On one side, we look at the dying agony of a Promethean monster. On the other side, our very lives are threatened by the services we are used to being withdrawn: modern medicine and hospitals, old age pensions, unemployment benefits and income support (or whatever they call “the dole” nowadays).

I have been reading about what might happen in the event of a currency collapse and hyperinflation – what happened in Germany enabling Hitler to get into power, Argentina, England in the 1970’s and other places. In an extreme scenario, the country concerned descends into chaos as services are withdrawn, food and fuel are no longer transported and delivered, and the electricity is switched off. In the cities, there would be looting and the efforts of desperate people to find food. Those in need of medication would not get medical care. If that happens, thousands and millions will die. Is that about to happen in America and Europe? To some extent, it has happened. Some entertain the idea of surviving. During the occupation of France by the Nazis, those who lived in the country fared better than those in the cities, but life was still very hard. Would it lead to dystopia à la George Orwell? It is a good question but I have no answer to that one.

Whether we are looking at an absolute catastrophe in human terms as the world is depopulated either by the consequences of the downfall of the financial empire of the ultra-rich or some kind of evil consortium of psychopaths, or whether we already get a glimpse of a new world that awaits us after the pain and suffering, we are definitely seeing a change of civilisation. The most likely outlook is more than a lifetime of suffering and penance in a long dark night of the soul.

Apart from the suffering I will have to endure as much as anyone else, I welcome the end of the consumerist culture, supermarkets, overpriced housing, crippling costs of the welfare state and the evils of those at the limit between questionable business practices and organised crime. If something bust the hypermarkets and other monsters of big business, would it bring back opportunities for small traders and shopkeepers? Probably not for a long time, but one can dream. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to be less reliant on our cars or pressured to move into a city! The dystopian visions are very depressing. Perhaps we in the countryside can barter – my woodworking skills for food and farm products – that is if the farm hasn’t been laid waste by hordes of starving city folk on the rampage. Most of us would not survive in a world of disease and starvation.

Nicholas Berdyaev wrote at length on a New Middle Ages, a notion of the period between the end of the Roman Empire and before the building of the cathedrals. He saw it coming after the demise of Marxist Communism or Nazism, but there was yet our own totalitarianism – of money – that had to run its course. In the past, there was no rotting concrete ruins, rusting wrecks of motor vehicles and Japanese nuclear power stations leaking their deadly radiation into the sea. The thought of it all is agonising. But, perhaps, nature has a way of recovering from us humans that we cannot imagine!

I have written a couple of sketchy ideas about the de-growth (décroissance) movement, but it seems not to be the aim of a political ideology but simply what is going to happen. We have technology but not the moral rectitude to use it for good. That is an old problem as speculated upon by Mary Shelley in her visionary novel Frankenstein. Using a computer is evidence of the use of technology and progress – but it can’t work without electricity or a communications network for the internet. If the basics go, my computer will be a useless pile of junk, just like my van if there is no fuel to power it. Christ warned his disciples that those who live by the sword will die by the sword. The same could be said of our technology and our machines. When all that is gone, I hope we will still have our books and everything we had before we discovered computers and the internet. This blog will vanish, with everything written on it except anything that might be printed on durable and good quality paper. Printing itself will only be possible by the kind of machines that existed in the nineteenth century and before. Are there still people trained in the craft of traditional printing? It is harder to go backwards and lose what we remember than discover new things! One of the reflections that has been through my mind, over these weeks of “doldrums” and the dearth of churchy news, was that blogs and the internet are fragile and fleeting. Just imagine where they would be without electricity! Nothing!

It is going to be more difficult than most of us imagine. American-style survivalism – a gun, two bars of gold and three weeks of tinned food – is a complete illusion. If this civilisation falls, many of us will die – which should not be a matter of fear for Christians. We will die of starvation, get murdered or executed by some totalitarian regime, or of disease because there aren’t any more doctors or hospitals. Some time or other, we have to die, and if we have the faith, we matter very little as individuals.

For those who survive and have some human, moral or even Christian ideal, the new world will have to be something human, small and beautiful. There has to be hope. Much of our present technology would be forgotten and recognised to have been of little lasting value.

After the fall of the Roman Empire, Saint Benedict came along and made something new of the monastic tradition – a civilising force and a drive to build a new world. At this time, I can see the slate being wiped clean (it will take longer than our lifetimes) and something luminous coming out of it. But, very few people would be influenced by monasticism. I think the greatest light will come from outside Christianity like the wisdom and medicine offered by the Arabs in the Middle Ages. Most of us are inclined to think that a new “social contract” could be built on a bartering economy, necessarily local and founded on honesty and moral instincts. Will that come about?

I rather look forward to the day when computers, cars and supermarkets will be a thing of the past, taken over by farming and fishing, working with our hands and preserving wisdom and knowledge through printed books and oral tradition.

If God grants me life and survival through the coming tribulations, I look forward to simplicity and innocence regained. One can but dream…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

In Medio Stat Virtus

In medio stat virtus is a Latin expression taken from Aristotle (and translated from Greek) by St Thomas Aquinas. It isn’t quite the Via Media of Hooker and some of our present-day enthusiasts of “classical Anglicanism”. It simply means that strength or virtue is found in the moderate position between – and above – the two extremes of any issue.

cyclistsI came across a Telegraph article about something completely unrelated to religion or Christianity but a sign of polarisation of positions and intolerance. This concerns people who ride bicycles – Take a stand against the false God of cycling. It is quite amazing, but something so predictable. I have ridden bicycles most of my life, from my tricycle which I converted to sail / pedal when I was about 10, my gleaming new bicycle for my 11th birthday. I have ridden these contraptions everywhere, fallen off them and still have a scar on my right elbow. I was once nearly killed riding into the side of a moving car when I was about 12. I have ridden all round London and Paris, and saved a lot of bus and Metro ticket money. I still have a bicycle and go for rides in the country, and take it to Rouen on Monday mornings when I go and give English lessons. Riding a bicycle is good physical exercise, good for health and non-polluting. Great, but not everyone rides a bike!

Also, I take pride in riding without any kind of helmet or anything other than ordinary clothes. As in any sport, those who take it too seriously really look the part, and often overdo it. I find the same thing with sailing with expensive sporting boats and all the clobber. It would also be like driving a car with leather gloves and goggles like the chauffeurs of the 1920’s! Why do we take ourselves so seriously?

I also drive a car, and have had experience of both intolerant and rude car drivers and cyclists alike. I have added a means of locomotion on water – sailing. I also went on a gliding course with a friend up on Sutton Bank in Yorkshire when I was 16 and had the thrilling experience of flying. Locomotion is a means of recreation as well as getting from A to B for reasons unrelated to the journey itself. I can understand the grievances of cyclists in regard to bullying motorists. I was in London in about 1982, somewhere near Oxford Street, and was in the wrong lane. A taxi physically forced me to turn the way he was going – very unpleasant. In my experience, being a motorist made me a better cyclist. You learn the Highway Code and the limitations of your vehicle due to its width and wheelbase. Cyclists do better when they observe the Highway Code and make sure they are in the right lane for turning left or right or straight ahead. The road is for all.

People on bicycles can be very rude and intolerant, as can people in cars or in motor boats on the sea. We have the same problem between sailing vessels and fast motor boats with engines as big as the egos of their skippers. There is perhaps less kindness on the road, but there are fewer on the water. I don’t think this is a problem that can be solved by laws other than the application of the present Highway Code, but by education and a different society from the one we live in.

This Telegraph article shows the tendency of everything in reverse: racism, sexism and the domination of the weak over the strong. Women try to dominate men, non-white people discriminate against white people, homosexuals against “straight” society, and now cyclists against motorists. I appreciate the tremendous progress made in towns where the road system has been designed to offer cyclists better and safer conditions. I appreciate the cycling ways in Rouen. The system is very well designed, and there are points where people can hire bicycles when they don’t have their own, or when they just want a short ride without taking their cycles on the train. It’s very convenient. I am grateful to see better conditions for women and non-whites. Racism and sexism are evils to be condemned, whether they come from one “side” or the other. Polarisation is a very dangerous tendency, when if we are critical of something – for example the LGBT lobby – we are on the opposite extreme. Many of us just want tolerance and respect for the majority as well as the minorities.

What makes people tolerant and considerate for other people? Basically, it is empathy which is born from humility and truth about oneself and our limits. We live in a world that makes it almost impossible to get on in life unless we are willing to compete and push others out of the way. Some call that Social Darwinism. Christ taught a different way, that of taking a step back and seeing more meaning to life in being good to others, self-sacrifice and being less ambitious.

In regard to the use of public highways, cyclists need to keep well in to the kerb to let the cars past, and motorists need to watch their distance and speed, knowing that the aerodynamic slipstream from the car can be as dangerous to the cyclist as physical contact. These are things we need to know. We can see this issue literally, as well as analogically. What is the effect of our lust for power and domination on others?

What will it profit us if we gain the whole world and lose our soul?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Bugnini’s Ghost, the Persisting Rumours

I won’t waste time on this one other than tipping my virtual hat to Deborah Gyapong, Fr Finigan and Fr Zuhlsdorf. I already mentioned this rumour a few months ago, which is again in the news with William Oddie’s article in the Catholic Herald Is Pope Francis thinking of appointing as prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship a disciple of Annibale Bugnini deeply hostile to Benedict XVI’s reforms?

I have already mentioned that I am an outsider to Roman Catholic affairs, but not indifferent to the many priests and laity who face the “return of the old guard” or being alienated from churches. The rumour of Archbishop Piero Marini being appointed Prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship was first spotted by Damian Thompson last June. Archbishop Marini is a disciple of the late Archbishop Annabile Bugnini who was in charge of the liturgical reform of the 1960’s and 70’s, and was only stopped in his tracks by Paul VI for going too far (some say it was because he was found out to be a Freemason). The above mentioned blogs, all conservative Roman Catholic, consider that such an appointment would be a kick in Pope Benedict XVI’s teeth, since it would mean a reversal or “moratorium” on his liturgical legislation in the direction of tolerance for traditionalists attached to the “extraordinary use” of the Roman rite.

One thing that makes me quite afraid is the traditionalists being unable to come up with anything original. If this rumour is true and Marini gets the job, he might think he is taking us back to the 1970’s. However we live in more cynical times and the Church is having that much more difficulty in maintaining any kind of credibility. I wrote a reflection on Pope Francis some days ago, and he has endearing qualities. I could understand him not being interested in liturgy and keeping the status quo of the Benedictine papacy – but to reverse it and deliberately alienate the traditionalists and conservatives (even with their aggressive proselytism) is something else – and indeed would send out an unambiguous message.

Whatever now happens, we as Anglican Catholics are called to a new mission, not preserving Anglicanism of the seventeenth century or ultramontanist Roman Catholic triumphalism – but preserving and fostering Catholic liturgical culture and a much wider vision than that to which many of us have become accustomed. At least as far as I am concerned, the aim would not be to have Roman Catholics come over to us, but that we should be a model of plain mainstream Catholicism as it was until the 1530’s and until the end of the eighteenth century in some parts of the world. We need to do this positively without any harshness or polemics, or any “true church” claim – just make sure that our light is visible to all.

There have been Roman Catholic traditionalist communities for more than forty years, and they cater for their faithful as we Continuing Anglicans do. Some call themselves Continuing Catholics. It is unfortunate that many are still influenced by Ultramontanist ecclesiology, and thus find it difficult to justify their dissidence.

All we can do is continue and persevere, however hopeless it all may seem. As our fake wartime mugs and beer mats say – Keep calm and carry on!

* * *

For information, see Explosive revelation: Benedict XVI himself sees Francis’ restriction of the Traditional Mass for the Franciscans of the Immaculate as a “wound” to Summorum Pontificum.

What a mess!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 7 Comments

Doldrums

doldrumsI get the impression the Doldrums have arrived at this beginning of October. I don’t know whether it’s just me or more generally. I thought of the subject the other day when I took the boat out and the wind dropped, leaving slowly flapping and hanging sails. I look around my “usuals” most mornings with my coffee and cheese and Marmite (an English habit my French wife hates! 😉 ) on toast.

News about the Roman Catholic Church and Pope Francis can be found from different partisan points of view, and I just don’t feel inclined to enter the discussion. From the gentle Jesuit father conducting a retreat and hearing confessions to concerns about the liturgy. I’m just not part of it and it just isn’t in my life.

We are indeed far from heady days, and I get the impression that we are sad (in the northern hemisphere) with the declining days, the leaves on the trees changing colour and the timid sun rays through the heavy cumulus clouds. In a few short weeks, it will no longer be possible to go sailing except perhaps a day here or there on an inland lake or out of the Port of Saint Valéry en Caux to avoid the breaking waves on the beach. Winter is ahead of us … Brrr! And the long range weather forecasters are talking of a severe one this year!

All the same, we carry on practising our religion as priests or lay people. Even when devotion wanes and distractions enter our prayer, we persevere and do our duty for God and our neighbour. It is at such a time when prayer is at its purest. Without sensational news, we get on with deeper things like reading philosophy and theology, refreshing and building our knowledge and curiosity, discovering and making new landfalls. It is a time when I can be actually reading the books Dr William Tighe keeps sending me! I have a whole series on Gnosticism by Elaine Pagels and some more orthodox / biblical points of view. It’s fascinating stuff.

The wind will rise and the sails will fill, and there will again be eddies of water around the rudder. Sometimes we have to wait – or get the oars out and row – and everything comes to he who waits.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 6 Comments

Two Mirror Rig Questions

Another couple of search terms came up about the Mirror rig. I make no claim to expertise in this domain. I just know where to look and my boat has a Mirror rig which I set up every time I go sailing like so many others. I recommend looking at this site which concerns building a Mirror dinghy from a kit you can buy.

Where does a mirror downhaul connect?

Just to be clear about terminology, downhaul is what some call the boom vang, the device for tightening the leech of the mainsail when the boat is sailing upwind.

mast_stepThis image shows the mast step of a Mirror dinghy and the central mast step wooden support (not the thin piece of plywood but the block to which it is attached), linking the mast step to the keel of the boat, ensuring maximum strength. The shackle for hooking the bottom part of the downhaul pulley system is attached to this strong wooden support. The top part of the downhaul is a loop of rope which goes round the boom and is stopped from sliding towards the mast by a small triangular block of wood.

If downhaul means the cunningham for tightening the luff of the mainsail, then I attach one end of the rope to the bottom of the mast, through a pulley attached to the sail’s tack and then down again to a cleat on the foredeck within the sailor’s reach. Thus I have equal access to the cunningham, the downhaul and the outhaul to set my sail. The genuine Mirror has a different system, and attaches the cunningham to the boom. I disagree with that system, as it put stress on the boom gooseneck.

Mirror dinghy with mainsail only?

All sailing boats have their centre of effort in relation to their centreboards, and this determines the balance of the boat between lee helm and weather helm. The Mirror is normally designed to sail with a mainsail and a jib. However, it has a second mast step, further forward, and a second pair of anchoring points for the starboard and port shrouds – these two things making it possible to move the mast forward by a precise distance (as designed by the naval architect) in relation to the centreboard. When this is done, it is possible to sail with the mainsail alone in a cat boat rig.

In a force 4 or less, I can handle my boat with its jib, as the mainsail alone leaves the boat with much less power. I only sail without the jib with a reefed mainsail in heavier wind conditions, which brings the centre of effort forward. Sailing the Mirror as a cat boat can be helpful for the beginner, and it is not without accident that the designer of the Mirror, Jack Holt, provided for this possibility in his design.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Article by Fr Jonathan Munn

Fr Jonathan Munn has just written this article in which he contends that man isn’t totally depraved. I won’t go into all the theology of it, the various theories of grace and sin from Saint Augustine to the present day.

I was listening to a video talk of an Australian who sailed a dinghy no bigger than mine from England to the Black Sea via a whole network of rivers and canals. His reflection was that it is a mistake to see all people as bad or selfish. There are many gestures of empathy, practical help, human solidarity, you name it. I have had the same experience with people of the sea, people I don’t know from Adam, but who are capable of extraordinary acts of kindness – and that encourages me to be attentive to their safety and well-being.

If I only considered the way people behaved in their cars, I would become about 90% Calvinist. But the way people are in boats and at sea, I would say it is the other way round. Only a minority would carve up a sailing dinghy with their powerful engines and big waves from their boats!

Power corrupts and, usually, empathy decreases as a person gets on the ascendency. Is it better to stay on the bottom, powerless and humble? Perhaps. If someone finds himself in power despite his own wishes to remain humble and unambitious, he is truly a saint if he keeps his empathy. In which case, power will be a terrible weight. I think of some of the men in history who wanted to be humble priests but were asked by the Church to be bishops and popes.

Humility is a grace, as is empathy for other people. Those are the greatest treasures we can find in life. Robert Baden Powell, the famous founder of the Boy Scouts, was a great believer in looking for good in his Scouts rather than evil, and to build up on what is good and noble in each of us. That would seem to be the healthiest philosophy of life, especially for Christians.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Have Table will go

If you’re really desperate and have an outboard engine…

table-outboardLooks like fun, and you can have your dinner in style on the beach!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment