Baroness Margaret Thatcher RIP

margaret-thatcherI don’t usually discuss politics here, but I do honour this great lady who served our country by conviction and altruism. I am old enough to remember the years between the administration of Edward Heath, his resignation, the Labour fiasco of Jim Callaghan and the vote of no-confidence – and the election of Mrs Thatcher in 1979. Our country was an utter mess and the strikes were never-ending.

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.

How true! It doesn’t grow on trees!

I viscerally protest the various songs and other demonstrations rejoicing in Mrs Thatcher’s death, especially as she did not die in office but after many years of retirement and illness. It is understandable that people of left-wing political opinions are opposed to Conservatism or the values of Mrs Thatcher’s party, but this kind of mocking and rejoicing is inhuman.

She served our country and she did her best in a very difficult situation.

Requiescat in pace.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 14 Comments

A Lovely English Altar

Here is a fine English altar by Comper which I found on Facebook. The church is St Wilfrids, Cantley in Yorkshire. A comment says that the altar is still there but now has the big six on it. There is a hanging tester, but no hanging pyx (which is frankly rare in Anglican churches).

Anyway, here it is:

cantley-comper-altar

It is described as dating from 1894 and the photo would have been taken around that time.

Update. I have just received this photo of the church as it is now – beautiful. There’s a possibility the altar has been pushed forward for versus populum celebrations, but that is not obvious in the photo.

cantley2-small

Up-update. Here’s another photo a kind soul sent to me via a link on his comment. It appears still to be eastward facing and like in the late nineteenth-century photo. Only the frontal and riddels are different, and there are no fewer than ten candlesticks on the altar – quite unnecessary – and shortened riddle post candles. Fortunately, in the Church of England, changes can’t be made to churches without a faculty, which is quite irksome to obtain, apparently. Perhaps the church is also a Grade I listed building. Thank goodness for such laws!

cantley3

As a kind soul has reminded me, see my earlier article Four Riddel Posts Do Not Constitute the Sarum Rite.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 9 Comments

Liturgical Formation

Very often in our Churches, we are concerned about our extremely limited resources even if we have the courage and ingenuity to put them to full use. In his Charge to the Synod last Saturday, our Bishop had something to say about the liturgy as having been designed for use in great churches and elaborate ceremonies. Our churches are small, and they require the liturgy to be simplified for the available resources. This has always been done since the time when rubricists like Adrian Fortescue and J.B. O’Connell began to rationalise the ceremonies for masses without deacon and subdeacon and even when the priest was alone apart from a single server or even only a lay person in attendance. They based their work on approved sources like the Ritus Servandus and the Memoriale Rituum together with other decisions from the Roman Congregation of Rites. Anglican liturgists came up with books adapted for their rites like Ritual Notes. These are practical issues which remain an important aspect of our pastoral service to the faithful. But the art of the liturgy, the ars celebrandi, must go much further than practical instructions or rubrics – doing the red and saying the black.

Another aspect of the liturgy is what it means and how we relate to it. What happened to the liturgical life by the early sixteenth century happened again by the 1950’s. The problem was not that the rite was too complex or in a foreign language, but that people were no longer relating to it fully. Piety became individualistic and sentimental. This is where clergy and lay people need to be formed in the nature of the liturgical action and its symbolism. How do we conduct ourselves?

One thing we need to overcome is dualism or separation and opposition between any two things in our lives. We are whole persons of body and spiritual soul, and we participate in the liturgy in our wholeness. We become more human in the deepest sense so that divine grace might transfigure us. The first task of liturgical formation is making ourselves and others “capable of symbols”. How do we learn to conduct ourselves, our whole selves, through symbols? Some gestures are very simple, like kissing and making the sign of the cross, and others are quite complex, giving us a complete human experience. However, doing things, wearing things and saying special words are not all. We need to perceive the deep relationship between things and the notion of the whole. Relationship and familiarity are vital, the sense of being at home. Modern culture has done much to destroy these notions of familiarity and relationship, and alienates us so that we become dependent consumers. Think about the enormity of it!

The liturgy, as a “sacrament” (like the Church itself) enables the essence of things to be experienced and perceived through the special words and symbols we have in the liturgy. Certainly, children can be brought to seize these notions much more easily than adults. Children’s games are often highly ritualised. I remember that I had one game with my sister that involved listening to a piece of music and clapping the hands and performing bodily actions at exactly the right times, and then one could make a wish! This is the liturgical instinct the modern culture destroys in us. The liturgy therefore cannot be “adapted” to modern culture without destroying it and making it something eminently meaningless, soul-numbing and boring.

Then the liturgy brings us into the world of our relationship with each other in the Church, as the individual fits into the life of the community. The relationship constitutes communion and true personhood. The Church as universal communion and the person live in a mutual relationship. A study of the theology of the Church, ecclesiology, is vital – and this is why I have always been so insistent on the acquisitions of the twentieth century and the ressourcement school, with its obvious parallels in Eastern Orthodox theology. It is a church or parish that is conscious of this relationship that makes the liturgy possible. The liturgy brings us into full awareness of the Church.

In the Anglican tradition, we tend to be more ecclesial and communitarian than in some other communities. We need, all the same, to be watchful for any tendencies or temptations to individualistic isolation and excessive sentimentalism in prayer. Of course, extroversion can become excessive, and fail to consider the differences between persons with their natural temperaments. Privacy is something we treasure, and the community has to respect that at least to some extent. We, as human persons, all belong to a culture and a tradition – and this is the point of crisis in many of us who have been alienated for whatever reason from our cultural origins. The Church has to be our home.

There are landmarks that remain in spite of the destruction of humanity in our times. In the Churches of our times, we have suffered considerably from secularisation, desacralisation and alienation in the name of adapting to modernity. We are forced into superficial extroversion and deprived of our personality in a kind of potential Orwellian totalitarianism. Our era is marked by activism and noise that shout out and obliterate the contemplative and intercessory dimension of the Church.

One thing that is desperately needed in the Church is liturgical or mystagogical catechesis. Catechesis is not merely the teaching of doctrines and articles of faith, but the complete and whole life in Christ through the Church. We need to recover the great patristic tradition and develop an authentic rite of Christian initiation for adults. As Anglicans, our contact with the tradition of the Reformation has given us great love of reading the Bible, forming the Christian community and evangelising. We need also to develop the mystagogical side to balance out the intellectual dimension.

There are several notions in liturgical catechesis. Firstly, there is the explanation of basic liturgical signs and their relationship with our life and the actions of the Christ-Mystery. There is not only the ordinary of the Mass, the part that is repeated day in and day out. There is also the two cycles called temporal and sanctoral that superimpose each other and are woven together through the liturgical year. There is also a thorough study of the history of the liturgy in its different local and traditional rites, so that many symbols and gestures have a historical meaning.

We western rite clergy would do well to learn something about the Byzantine and other oriental rites, and also about the diversity of western rites in the dioceses of Europe and the religious orders. There is no excuse for ignorance and prejudice!

We are in a privileged situation to be able to learn from the mistakes others have made over the last half century in terms of “creativity” and “relevance”. Men like Pope Benedict XVI have emphasised the notion of bringing man to the liturgy rather than the liturgy to the modern world. The liturgy needs to be something objective and stable, with which familiarity can become possible. At the same time, it needs to be inhabited and made homely, and this is our chance as such a small and family-like Church. Clerics need to learn the ceremonies and make them a part of their personalities. The laity need to learn what things really mean and follow the rites with intelligence and their human personality. There are many things where lay people with special talents can participate that much more actively, particularly through singing and playing musical instruments.

Preaching has changed in its signification and there is a distinction to be made between the homily and the sermon, the former being an explanation of the Scripture readings, but also a mystagogical catechesis. The days of the sermon seem to be getting shorter and shorter, as people take increasing exception to being “preached at” and moralised! People take personal offence at notions intended merely to illustrate points, which are better reserved for study sessions. We have a lot to learn here. I am sure that bishops could open this ministry to knowledgeable persons, including women who have studied theology to an equivalent standard to that of clerics.

There are also many practical aspects to liturgical formation. For the clergy, including assistants and servers, the ceremonies should be learned to perfection, but there is also a style of behaviour that is sober and measured, confident and reverent, precise and far from sloppiness, yet not cold or mechanical, not theatrical or showy, but clear, human and warm. People feel intuitively when things are right. The church needs to be tastefully appointed and dignified, without the excesses of being a bric-a-brac shop on one side or a spartan whitewashed preaching barn on the other. I believe that lessons can be learned from the Arts & Crafts movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries – sobriety, simplicity and high quality of workmanship. Regardless of precise style, there need to be objective standards like the dimensions (especially the height) of the altar, sanctuary steps, etc.

Among many ideas for improving the life of our dioceses, parishes, missions and chaplaincies, a great idea would be a liturgical institute where theological, practical and cultural teaching can be grouped and made available to both clergy and laity. This is something I have dreamed about for many years, but it is hampered by the desperate lack of resources. Actually, we have more than we thought we had. We have the Internet and instant telecommunications that are now no more expensive than our fixed monthly connection charge. We need to use these to the best and develop ways to make our books and sources available, and not limited by people’s ability to travel and find time for fitting in with schedules. That needs a considerable amount of thought, motivation and commitment.

We have to be positive and get the ideas out.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 10 Comments

Of Rudders, Boats and Churches

It was a great pleasure for me to meet Deacon Jonathan Munn in London last Friday evening and during the day of the Saturday preceding my reception into the ACC. One incredible thing is that people are usually completely different from the images we make of e-mail correspondents and those who comment on our blogs. I found someone of keen intellect and youthful charm – together with his beautiful fiancée.

He has written a new article in his blog Compassion, Coracles and Continuity in which he gives me a good swing of the thurible! I was also at the Synod, but as I was not yet received, I had not to vote. I was able to observe the brisk and businesslike proceedings and the refreshing way of avoiding any waste of time. For example, documents previously sent to us all had not to be read out. It was all very efficient unlike many meandering and boring church meetings of self-important narcissists. Bishop Damien Mead has a keen sense of getting on with the job!

Indeed, this was something encouraging and uplifting. There were no polemics or contentious issues, just a good rousing Charge to the Synod and swiftly concluded business. In the Bishop’s Charge, we heard much about confidence, and that is something many of us lack. We need to sail out into deeper water and cast the nets over the other side of the boat – and catch fish!

The ACC in England is indeed a small local Diocese of the wider Church. It wasn’t much bigger in Bishop Hamlett’s day, but it has become quiet, serious, realistic and credible. It has also become more southern English and cosmopolitan – though I say this as a northerner myself! We are small and marginal, but yet we are what we say we are – no exaggerated numbers and no playing games. We are part of the great alphabet soup of continuing Churches, often told we have to stop “deceiving” people and become “real” Catholics. We are like a tiny boat bobbing up and down on the waves of the sea, and we sailors are lashing the boats together to weather the storm. The analogy has it limits, because a boat can often do better on its own in rough weather, with shortened sail and careful steering, than lashed to another or being towed. But the meaning is understood.

Coracles? The coracle was a primitive form of boat – animal skin stretched over a frame made of branches cut from trees and propelled by oars or paddles – and therefore has no rudder. Of course, there are many other types of small boats propelled by oars, sails or engines – and which also illustrate the purpose of considering our little family-like and intimate Church. My boat is a sailing dinghy, gaff rigged with mainsail, jib and a rudder. I have never had the occasion of hauling Deacon Munn out of the sea – though I have towed de-masted catamarans under sail to the shore. I have also been de-masted a couple of times due to shoddy rigging (which I have since replaced). Once I got to the beach with a jury rig, and the other time, there happened to be a motor boat that kindly towed me in. But, I thank him for the analogy. The sea of Catholic Christianity is also a dangerous place where one can get into a load of trouble. I intend to help the ACC in every way possible especially through the more intellectual and cultural aspects, together with hands-on experience with things like fitting out places or worship and installing pipe organs in places big enough to house them. Unlike Captain Nemo, I won’t be installing organs in submarines!

He tells of my adventures with trolls and how I recognise them not only in their rudeness and incivility, but their loading comments to provoke the endless obsessive threads that ruin discussions. It is tempting to be scrupulous and think of them as human beings with freedom of speech – but it’s them or me, kill or be killed – so I just delete them. Life is too short to be worried about trolls. Otherwise they win. It’s like negotiating with terrorists or restricting everybody’s life because someone might be an evil doer. We have to be positive and make life go on.

The internet, like any written medium, deprives the writer of much of his humanity. So the way we write has to compensate for this handicap, like a blind person developing a much more acute sense of hearing. It comes with intuition and experience, and I’m not there yet. So, we have not to give up, but to contribute to making the Internet a more edifying and worthwhile place. The intention of the trolls is terra cremata, scorched earth. They are nihilists. They silence the blogs, and then we’re back to where we were before the Internet – no communication. A Church that doesn’t communicate dies.

Occasionally, you meet trolls in real life. They might have genuine grievances, but watch out when they start kicking you when you’re down, wanting to humiliate you to the extreme. But we shouldn’t dwell on that. Many others are constructive commenters, even when they show us we’re wrong in something. We need to be open to learning new things, but constructively – not by having someone destroy and annihilate our self-confidence.

Indeed, we cannot consider the Internet as our sole “niche” ministry. We should use it to the full. We also need to meet with real people and converse with them, even if they don’t want our particular religious “product”.

It truly makes a difference when two bloggers get together “in the flesh”. I have read about the idea of Fr Zuhlsdorf’s blognic. You get a group of bloggers together in an English pub and talk about things over pints of bitter. I met Deacon Munn in a hotel in Bloomsbury with our Bishop and others from our Diocese. It makes all the difference. The Americans seem to be able to afford to hop on planes all the time and travel to blognic places. We English can surely make it to a place a few times each year.

So, now we steer away from the wind and haul in the sails – and go our way to the Light of the world. Thank you, Deacon Jonathan.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Received into the Anglican Catholic Church

I have been quiet for a few days here on the blog, but not without reason.

The news is already out in different places on the Web about my reception into the Anglican Catholic Church (Original Province), Diocese of the United Kingdom. I have been in contact for some time with Bishop Damien Mead and have kept our dialogue and the preparation of this move under wraps. As the application process advanced, I resigned my place in the Traditional Anglican Church of Britain (TAC) and left the TAC in good standing with my prayers for their future ministry in England and elsewhere.

This step has not been taken lightly as many aspects had to be considered, especially that of the part of the world where I live. It has been, and continues to be, a long and hard journey in my priestly vocation and desire to work in the Lord’s Vineyard in whatever way possible in a world where the Christian Faith is nearly extinguished – and Churches are discredited by the media or their own sins.

As some formalities still need to be looked into with our Diocesan Board of Ministry, I have been issued with a Licence Pro Tempore by the Bishop which allows me to continue to exercise my priesthood in the Chaplaincy of Saint Mary the Virgin. I am grateful for this gift of continuity in my vocation as a priest in the Universal Church.

I will doubtlessly have other reflections to offer when my new mission in the Church of Christ has had time to sink in. In the meantime, I offer some photos and links to this happy event.

Only one thing marred this happy occasion – a slightly sprained but very painful left foot, with my ankle and bunion tendons on fire. My compassion went out to those who are truly handicapped and find walking difficult or impossible. Driving back to France was quite a stiff upper lip affair, as the clutch of my van is quite hard, and I had to push it with just the right part of my left foot! Well, I got home safely all the same.

The foot is much better now due to rest and the judicious use of paracetamol and I have seen no need to go to the doctor – for referral for an x-ray, a lot of waiting, uncertain diagnosis and a lot of ado about nothing. These things usually clear up on their own, as is happening this time.

reception

My reception in Canterbury, Sunday 14th April 2013

synod-dinner

Dinner in the evening before the Diocesan Synod

communion

Communion of the clergy at the Synod Mass

synod-clergy

Clergy present at the Diocesan Synod at Westminster Central Hall

Here are two links of sites run by our charming young deacon Rev. Jonathan Munn and long-standing e-mail friend, with whom I spent some very pleasant hours.

I also draw your attention to the excellent website of the Anglican Catholic Church.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 41 Comments

A Few Ideas for Us All

Religious fanaticism throughout history has caused many evils, including murder and genocide. Secular society is right in fighting against it. Much of the prejudice against religion held by atheists and agnostics is unfortunately justified.

So I’ll leave you with a few tips.

We should accept that every religion has some good and truth to it. We should see other religions and versions of Christianity for their good rather than their bad qualities. We should refrain from making personal accusations or threats. Don’t denigrate such and such a church or religion as false or bogus in relation to your own which is the “true church”. Learn to be kind and patient.

We should learn about other versions of Christianity (denominations, different theological “systems”, etc.) and about other religions. How many of us have read the Koran, even in an English translation? I haven’t, but I have taken the trouble to read some basic introductions to Islam. I know very little about Hinduism or Buddhism, but I know I am missing something unless I take the trouble to learn something.

How open are we to our ordinary life at work and at home? Are we forcing our beliefs on everyone else and judging? Or are we kind and teaching by meekness and example? Are we making friends outside our churches and discussing courteously with people who believe differently or not at all?

Are we prepared to learn tolerance, which does not mean that we do not believe in truth or the validity of what we might consider as wrong? Kindness is much more convincing than brutality either in deed, speech or writing.

We know that fanatics and zealots form a tiny minority in their communities, but like in society at large, they are the bullies, the sociopaths and narcissists that dominate and make life miserable to those who they would like to be lower in the pecking order. They ruin everything for everyone else. The evil is potentially within any of us.

Please comment wisely.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 16 Comments

Minimalism and Brutalism

I have written a few times to reflect the fear of quite a few of us that we should see a return of the worst of the 1970’s and brutal bad taste. This is an example in Austria which is often touted around the traditionalist blogs.

minimalist-church

Here’s a couple of interesting articles:

Fr Cantalamessa proposed on Good Friday that our problem is the residue of past ceremonials and other debris, and that our pressing need is to return to simplicity and linearity by knocking down partitions, staircases, rooms and closets so that we can reach out existentially. I don’t want to be unfair: it is true that sometimes habits need to be changed and there are non-essentials that can be dispensed with if necessary. What I object to is the idea that this is our main problem today. To keep at an existential level, I would put it like this: the parish Church is a room in everybody’s house. If we go knocking things down and clearing them out to create a brutal, minimalist space, we take away something from the poor – both the materially poor and the spiritually poor. At a deeper level, that statue of the Sacred Heart or that image of the Divine Mercy or the Infant of Prague may be a great comfort to the sheep among whom we live. The sacramentals which so much enrich the daily life of the faithful, the blessings, the processions, the waving of hankies to say goodbye to Our Lady Immaculate, the scapulars, medals and holy pictures, relics and indulgences, give skin and breath to the faith of the people.

Let us not brush them away in yet another era of plain concrete machines for assembling in. We priests can discuss among ourselves some of the more enthusiastic practices but we should never be so proud as to deprive the people of the love and devotion which they wish to show for the Lord though the five senses. We might think that we are ushering in a brave new world of simplicity through ever-so-tastefully understated polyester, that the people will hear the “Good News” when we drone an endless Liturgy of the Word through a microphone with enthusiastic references to the sitz im leben of modern man, and that somehow this will solve the problems of the woefully inadequate catechesis we have presided over.

Let’s keep the staircases, rooms and closets, and find in every nook and cranny the different sheep with different smells and different needs, and serve them in this glorious edifice which is the Catholic Church with all its beautiful accretions sanctified by the work of the saints through the ages. This great, fascinating, and inspiring building, the Catholic Church, is our home. Sometimes we need to clear out some junk. But whenever we do so, we are sure to find something that was loved of old, something we have forgotten, something that will bring a sparkle to the eyes of the young who do not yet know that it is presently unfashionable. Who knows? It may be the way that they come to be anointed with the oil of gladness and hear the “Good News.”

I somehow don’t think Pope Francis will condone spending huge amounts of money on converting beautiful churches into minimalist and brutalist churches. Enough of it still happened under the pontificate of Benedict XVI. They’ll do it where they can afford it in affluent Austria, where, frankly I don’t understand why those progressives even bother going to church rather than sleeping in on a Sunday morning.

This problem above all concerns those who have money. Those of us who make do with limited resources can often do something imaginative. That is what I believe is the Church of the future, returning to common sense, inventiveness and initiative. Then we might get somewhere.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Churches of the Future

We live at a time when nearly all the churches around us are closing down and are being left to rot. The less historical of these buildings, mostly left to us from the Victorian era, are occasionally given or sold to other Christian denominations or other religions. Usually, they are redeveloped as residential accommodation or business premises. With our dwindling congregations, who can afford the upkeep of most churches? It is a headache of most of the mainstream denominations and the Roman Catholic Church.

At the same time, only the more wealthy traditionalist organisations have been able to buy and restore old churches, or to build new ones to suit their numbers of faithful. Most of the Continuing Anglican Churches, at least elsewhere than in the USA, have had great difficulties in the matter of buildings and material resources.

One might ask oneself why we need churches at all. The answer is in one word – liturgy. Without the liturgy, a room in an ordinary house is enough to share the reading of the Scriptures and a time of prayer. The need for a church is both symbolic and practical. To celebrate Mass, you need an altar of the right height and a credence table. A rudimentary sacristy is useful unless the kitchen of the house and the bedroom wardrobe will be pressed into service to serve a dual-purpose.

Many Continuing Anglican missions are established in houses, and men and women can show extraordinary ingenuity when setting up a temporary chapel in a brightly lit room like the living room, and then the altar and other things can be stowed away when not in use, for example in the garden shed or the garage. The furniture is rearranged, and the altar put up against a window with the curtains closed. Another point of a church is to overcome the feeling of reserve we all have when we go into someone else’s home – respect of privacy, and particularly of that person’s or family’s bad taste in furnishings and decorations! A church is open to all, and it is the home of God, domus Dei et aula sanctificationis. The real meaning of the church is seen in the common for the dedication of a church in the missal. The church houses the altar and the liturgy – the sacramental presence of God – but also gives the worshipping community a place to go and identify with their faith.

Many local congregations are very small compared to the Victorian era or even forty years ago. Congregations in the medieval and Victorian parish churches, at least outside the big cities where parish leaders and clergy are particularly charismatic, are pitifully small. Continuing Anglican congregations may number only ten or twenty in a given place in the provinces, usually less than ten.

The cheapest way to have something like a church or a chapel is to convert an existing building. Some buildings are more suitable than others. Garages tend to be poky and squalid, built for a car, perhaps two cars and a domestic workshop for the handyman about the house. The thing that really kills a chapel is a low ceiling in proportion to the floor area and shape. Most garden sheds are too shoddy and are designed for keeping tools and machines like the lawnmower, perhaps with a shelf or two for keeping the geraniums out of the frost during the winter. Older houses sometimes have outbuildings with a greater degree of potential.

For up to ten people, I suggest a floor area of some twenty feet in length and twelve feet width. Everything will have to be very carefully designed, and there are usually constraints caused by positions of doors and windows, and sometimes by different floor levels. Here is a link to my own chapel. The building had all the potential, but there was no level floor, the walls were shoddily built and there is an ugly fibro-cement roof. I can’t remember what I spent, but it would be in the order of a few thousand Euros, mostly for preparing and adapting the building – doing all the work myself.

The alternative, assuming the availability of land and planning permission, is to build. The cost of building is usually prohibitive, and planning permission can be hard to get. There are also health and safety regulations governing public buildings, such that if they were implemented, it would be so much simpler to give up and abandon the project! The answer can be a “temporary” wooden building, assimilated to a garden shed.

Forget most commercially available garden sheds in kits. Often the kiln-seasoned wood is split and warped before you even start. The roof is often shallow-pitched and very low, and the whole is flimsy. I have one in my garden, which my wife insisted I should buy a few years ago – for garden stuff. I have had to do quite a few modifications to it just to keep it standing! The answer is designing and building in wood.

Some Western Orthodox in England have looked at this question in their site on Building a Chapel / Church. Making abstraction of the precise style of furnishing, the ideas given are very good. Find more ideas here [I’m not saying anything for or against this particular manufacturer and dealer – just drawing attention to the basic designs]. Here’s the famous Orthodox priest who did a wonderful job!

The first problem is land. The expensive way is to buy a plot of building land and obtain planning permission to build. If the building is public, it must conform to health and safety regulations, and the money will have to be available. The alternative is the use of private land with permission from the owner and the building being officially for private use. I defined my chapel, when I declared the change of use of the building, as a private cultural space. If the building can be assimilated to a garden shed, then nothing need be said to the official authorities. Keep it simple.

I won’t go into all the technical details, but watch for the dimensions beyond which planning permission is required. If that is the case, perhaps the project can go ahead but for private use. Then you don’t need ramps for handicapped access and toilets all over the place!

For the design of the building, there are two possibilities: the timbers of the walls being strong enough to constitute the structure of the building or the need for a frame. I favour the latter. I also favour a pitched roof to give the impression of height even if the side walls are no higher than seven or eight feet. If you don’t want to freeze to death in winter or swelter in the summer, you will need insulation and interior plasterboard. The outside would be cladding with some kind of insulation against damp. The electricity needs only to be simple: lights in the right places and a couple of 13A sockets. Running water is useful but not essential.

For the furnishing, two terms apply – simplicity and good taste. Simplicity will also be less expensive, and the chapel should not give the impression of masquerading as a cathedral. If the project is built on owned and private land, it can cost as little a just a couple of thousand quid. Maintenance costs will be negligible. If the insulation is properly done, heating will also be economical.

This arrangement may only be temporary, but it gives a new mission the time to get established and grow before making more material commitments. How temporary? Human nature being what it is, what is temporary tends to become permanent, so the building needs to be good enough for, say, five to ten years. That being said, there are plenty of little wooden chapels in Russia and the Ukraine that have been there for centuries and withstood almost a century of Communism and neglect.

As mentioned, rather than buying a wooden shed kit, read up on designing and building wooden structures, acquire woodworking and joinery skills (evening classes at your local technology school) and build your own. Get the base right – either an insulated concrete base or a space under the wooden floor (which also needs both insulation and ventilation). The best thing is to have an experienced joiner (who might be prepared to negotiate his rates or work on a voluntary basis) and practically inclined men helping him.

Design the chapel carefully. There needs to be a sanctuary with the altar, and enough space for a dignified ceremony, and somewhere for the lay faithful to go. Simple wooden benches take less space than cumbersome pews and chairs. The Orthodox site gives some very good ideas.

For the furnishing, which is simple and in good taste, it can be bought second-hand or made. Avoid cumbersome Victorian styles! A sacristy isn’t essential and a simple wardrobe to one side would suffice: one side for vestments and albs, the other side with shelves. Don’t put fiddleback vestments on hangers! For this reason, gothic vestments would be more practical. There’s no need for a confessional – all you need is a cushion for the penitent to kneel on and the priest sits on any convenient bench. Think of it like a boat – space needs to be used, so you have units that double for two or more uses.

The altar can be made of wood, even plywood with varnish or paint. There are all kinds of tricks to give the right appearance. Get the dimensions right. Six feet long is a convenient size and enough depth for a corporal and the foot of the altar cross. If you use a hanging pyx, you don’t need gradines or the space for a tabernacle. The exact height is 95 cm, no more or less. Keep it simple. Use dossals and riddels, or a wooden reredos so as not to have an empty wall behind the altar. A window above the reredos is a plus, especially if the chapel is truly eastward-facing. For the consecrated part of the altar, you can put in an altar stone or use a Greek antemension. The altar should have a frontal. The credence can be a simple shelf attached to the wall to the right of the altar.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 13 Comments

Pearls of Wisdom

Lest I should be seen to be the old square liturgy buff I am, I would like to share some quotes from Pope Francis in Few Surprises. Francis Is Just That Way.

I confess that in general, through the fault of my temperament, the first solution that comes to my mind is the wrong one. Because of this I have learned to distrust my first reaction. Once I am more tranquil, after I have passed through the crucible of solitude, I draw near to that which I must do. But no one can save me from the solitude of decisions. One can ask for advice but, in the end, one must decide alone.

This is a man who knows about the discernment of spirits in the Exercises. On the other hand, our decisions are entirely ours, and no spiritual director can be of any help in this – other than by proffering principles on which to base any sound decision. I don’t have Pope Francis’ responsibility, whether as Pope, Archbishop of Buenos Aires or Jesuit Provincial. But I have had to, and still have to, face decisions in utter solitude and no help from God is forthcoming. We must decide alone.

I am sincerely convinced that, at the present time, the fundamental choice that the Church must make is not that of diminishing or taking away precepts, of making this or that easier, but of going into the street in search of the people, of knowing persons by name. And not only because going to proclaim the Gospel is its mission, but because if it does not do so it harms itself. It is obvious that if one goes into the street it can also happen that one has an accident, but I prefer a thousand times over an accident-ridden Church to a sick Church.

This is the mind of a parish priest or perhaps even a provincial diocesan bishop of a hundred years ago. We have to expose ourselves, go and get our hands dirty on the job, be seen to be priests as we do something for the poor. This is what my old parish priests used to do in their battered and worn cassocks, just keeping people company without ramming the Faith down their throats. An accident-ridden Church to a sick Church? My old superior used to tell us about Cardinal Siri saying that he preferred to be considered as stupid twenty times than unjust one single time!

By all means, we can and must hold onto our liturgy and all that makes Christ incarnate. But we also have to be pastors and wise men, men with hearts, humanity and humility – the kind of humility that knows it sins by pride. And I believe that Pope Francis will teach us, Roman Catholics and men and women of other Catholic Churches, this way of wisdom and humanity, the way of the heart.

He has only one lung and cannot sing. He only speaks Italian and Spanish and a smattering of one or two other languages. But, I, with my little tenor voice and love of music, have only half (or much less of) the father’s heart he has. In this I am entirely with him!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 4 Comments

Holy Week Rites

Parisianrite1705

Pontifical Mass at Notre-Dame de Paris in 1705

Preference for the pre-1955 Holy Week rites in the Roman Catholic Church is still a relatively marginal question. I have two friends in England who are particularly interested in the question and who are regular readers of my blog. At least one of them, using the handle Rubricarius, has known John Tyson, a layman who devoted himself for many years to producing the famous Ordo in Latin according to customs of the middle of the last century before the unpleasant and unfortunate changes of the 1950’s and early 1960’s. This Ordo is now produced by Rubricarius, who runs The Saint Lawrence Blog.

I was also trained in the Roman Rite at seminary by a remarkable young priest by the name of Fr Frank Quoëx who was the MC and taught liturgy to the seminarians. He possessed the art of paying lip service to the 1962 liturgy and did as much as he dared of the pre-Pius XII rites during Holy Week, and also the use of folded chasubles in Lent.

Many have remarked that if the Pope should ever decide to do the ancient Papal Mass again, Fr. Quoëx would have been one of the few people who could have arranged it properly.

One piece of work he gave us to read was The “Restored” Holy Week by Msgr Léon Gromier, Papal Master of Ceremonies during the Pontificate of Pius XII – a conference given in 1960. I did this translation, though others may also have done translations (better than mine certainly) since I did this one around about the beginning of this century. I have already written on this subject in Monsignor Léon Gromier and Liturgical Reform.

Rorate Caeli has just published two parts of a FIUV Position Paper on the 1955 Reform of the Holy Week services. The texts are available through Rorate Caeli or in pdf format:

This author also recommends Philip Goddard’s Festa Paschalia. These papers are intended for non-specialist consumption.

I get a nagging feeling that questions of liturgy in the Church of Pope Francis are going to look like individual persons crossing the Atlantic in small boats or even swimming across! Also under Benedict XVI, there was no sign of anything substantial being done to the rites themselves, to either the “extraordinary” or “ordinary” forms of the Roman rite, using the terms used by the Pope emeritus in Summorum Pontificium. Perhaps such studies would give courage to individual priests and communities to take their own initiatives and break with the post-Tridentine instinct of not going to the toilet or sneezing without permission of the Congregation of Rites or the post-Vatican II equivalent.

In France, priests have taken initiatives for decades. One might exclaim – And look what a mess the liturgy in France is in! One might also notice a more liturgically-motivated reaction to the 1960’s reforms and the “heresy of formlessness“. There are two sides to priests taking liberties. Anglicans have always been masters at tweaking the liturgy to conform to rules and at the same time restore pre-Reformation norms as much as possible, stretching everything to the utmost limit. Percy Dearmer – and never mind about allegations of his favouring theological modernism!

But, indeed, there are no easy answers. Surprisingly enough, and I’m sure Patricius will pick me up – most Latin rite traditionalists seem to be satisfied with the 1950’s reforms of Monsignor Annabile Bugnini – because Pius XII was the Pope at the time! Was Bugnini a case of falsus in uno falsus in omnibus, or was it all part of a big plan as evidence suggests?

Comment as you will, but try to be positive and constructive. I use Sarum, not because I consider it a perfect rite, but because it has been undisturbed (because of its disuse) since 1549. Some things seem to be more “logical” because they haven’t been “disturbed” by the insertion of aspects of popular religion. That being said, that can be said for aspects of any rite. It is perhaps for the reason that liturgical rites are so imperfect, being the products of human minds and hands, that they should be left as undisturbed as possible – without “pruning them back” to “restore pristine simplicity” – – – or – – – introducing the parish’s favourite Blessed Sacrament and Rosary devotions to guild the lily!

The Eastern Orthodox seem to have kept liturgical stability and a liturgical sense. Why can’t we? Oh, please, Orthodox readers – be kind!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 41 Comments